|
Tape |
Online Backup |
1 |
Tape based solutions generally provide only daily snapshots. This normally results in periods of exposure to data loss of up to 24 hours. |
Secures your data offsite as the backup happens, with no window of vulnerability. |
2 |
65% of tape based solutions reside in the server they are there to protect - not much use if the computer room floods or the server gets stolen! |
Data is automatically transferred off site. |
3 |
Typically take only one copy of your data. |
Multiple copies may easily be maintained, at different locations. |
4 |
Setting up backup policies can be challenging. |
Setting up backup policies is simple. Choose to back up everything or fine tune by taking out files/directories using an easy to use interface. |
5 |
Typically, create complex logs that are difficult to follow. |
Provides an audit trail allowing administrators to view previous restore activities. |
6 |
Tape can be unreliable. |
Has built in checks and measures to ensure that your backup will be reliable. Test restores are simple to perform. |
7 |
Restoring from tape involves locating the right tape, retrieving it, mounting it, locating file and only then restoring it. |
Although your data is securely stored off-site, it can be located and restored immediately - from your desktop. |
8 |
Restoration of small or single files is challenging, time consuming and inconvenient. |
The ability to easily retrieve small and single files becomes a daily benefit, not a chore. |
9 |
Require frequent intervention to change media, check logs, etc. |
Fully automated - set it and forget it. |
10 |
No guarantee of data integrity or successful restore. |
Data integrity can easily be checked daily - can also be fully monitored 24/7, with the whole backup process checked end to end. |
11 |
Tapes are vulnerable to loss, damage or theft. |
Far more secure - use of encryption and/or digital certification. |
12 |
Typically relies upon skilled IT staff to handle tapes and configure. |
You control who has permission to carry out backup and restore tasks. Authority can be delegated to trusted users for specific servers. |
13 |
Restoring data on servers at remote sites can entail expensive, time consuming journeys by IT staff |
IT staff can control file restore operations to remote sites - no need to visit. |
14 |
Involve deployment of tape drives in each server or expensive dedicated backup servers. |
Removes need for tape drives and backup servers. Can use spare bandwidth on existing network circuits. |
15 |
One tape drive typically supports one server. |
Supports multiple servers – and standalones and laptops - over multiple offices. |
16 |
In shared tape environments, only one restore request can be handled at a time and backup operations are interrupted. |
Supports concurrent backup and restore operations on multiple servers. |
17 |
Limited disaster recovery capability. |
Disaster recovery options far wider. |
18 |
Tape doesn't scale particularly well. |
Easily scaleable, no matter how big or small your requirement. |
19 |
Tape standards change – many companies are storing old tapes they could no longer restore |
Maintain accessibility to older data. |
20 |
With tape recovery you're often on your own. |
Expert assistance is only a phone call away. Nationwide support available. |
21 |
There is a lot of wasted capacity. |
You only pay for the amount of data that you have. There is no wastage. |
22 |
Full system restore with tape can be problematic. |
Full system restores with Online Backup are generally far simpler and if necessary can be carried out on your behalf by experts working remotely or at your site. |
23 |
Tapes are not cheap and need to be refreshed every year to maintain viability |
Backups maintained on reliable and cost effective mirrored disk with long term viability. |